These posts are a combined group of thoughts, articles, and news items. But I won't tell you which is which, so please take everything with a grain of salt.
Monday, November 29, 2010
Retweeting and You: a guide to who said what on Twitter
For those of you who don't know, Twitter is a microblogging platform for sharing just about anything in a very digestable 140 characters or less.
Sometimes you will hear something profound and you want to share it with everyone who follows you on twitter in case they don't follow the same profound twitter users that you do. Enter the Retweet.
Retweet = twitter slang for Repeat.
You are simply repeating what someone else is saying.
There are three popular ways to retweet:
1. Click the Retweet Link on twitter.com
When viewing your twitter account on twitter.com you can see all of the updates from people you follow. When you see something interesting that you want to simply repeat to all of your followers, hover your mouse over the tweet and a "Retweet" link will be available.
Immediately the tweet goes out to your followers and they see the originator's name and profile photo along with an icon to make sure they know it was retweeted. (it also shows that you are the one who retweeted it)
2. Manual RT (quoting)
When viewing your twitter account, if you see something awesome and you want to add a short comment, just copy the tweet, and type "RT: @{username} {original tweet} //{comments}"
For example: on November 26, 2010 @RickWarren said:
"Theology should determine your morality,not vice-versa. If u get it backwards you create a false God who excuses your sin."
So my tweet might be:
"RT @RickWarren Theology shld dtermine your morality,not vice-versa If u get it bkwrds you create a false God who excuses your sin. //Amen!"
Notice three things there:
1. I had to shorten some words to fit,
2. I got to add my own comment. in this instance, not so insightful,
3. I could fake this and pretend @RickWarren said anything and there would be no way to verify authenticity. The Retweet button on twitter enforces authenticity by having the servers (which won't lie until after they overthrow humanity) retweet the message instead of being manipulated by a human first.
3. Via (the no-holds-barred retweet)
The via is a weird and often misused tool. It basically says "this concept came from this guy" -or- "this phrase came from a resource not on twitter".
For example, if I'm in a meeting and my non-tweeting boss exclaims "I love how high-tech these new fax machines are!" I might tweet: "I love how high-tech these new fax machines are! //via my boss who orders us the phone book on CD to seem current with technology"
Or I might write "You will get an even better fortune the next time you eat here //via the most awesome fortune cookie ever" if the resource is not a person.
Sometimes people use it for twitter users in place of option 1 or 2... such as:
"Theology should determine your morality,not vice-versa. If u get it backwards you create a false God who excuses your sin. //via @RickWarren"
Some things to note:
1. it is ALWAYS longer to end a tweet with //via @username than to simply write RT: @username before the tweet.
2. it is confusing where your own comments/replies go
3. it looks like you are saying something, rather than someone else... letting people know at the beginning of the tweet who first said it helps put the tweet in context.
4. I don't like this method unless I'm retweeting fortune cookies, the elderly, or 18th century technology such as the modern cotton gin or fax machines.
A quick test:
On November 4th I (@oneseventeen) wrote:
RT @ckehayias: Just in case any missed the news! We are having a baby girl sometime late March! //Awesome!
Question:
Who do you think is having a baby girl?
Answer:
@ckehayias is having a baby girl.
He announced it on twitter on November 4th by saying: "Just in case any missed the news! We are having a baby girl sometime late March!"
I was excited for him, and wanted to offer him congratulations while spreading the word. So I chose option 2 from above, the quoted retweet, then I added the comment "Awesome!" at the end by placing two forward-slashes then my comment.
See the resemblance?
RT @{username} {original tweet} //{my comment}
RT @ckehayias: Just in case any missed the news! We are having a baby girl sometime late March! //Awesome!
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
The iPhone: a Designer's dream?
I received an email linking to a HOW article on using the iPhone and iPad for design.
Awesome article, but I'd choose LastPass over 1Password personally.
I'd also check out the average iPhone 4 prices:
First, the cheapest:
$0/mo no text messing
$40/mo 450 minutes
$15/mo 200MB of data (a.k.a. 1 episode of V on Hulu per month, and a few emails)
$200 - 16GB iPhone 4
$500 - WiFi iPad
Total 2 year commitment: $1,820
Now, who is going to have an iPhone 4 with no text messaging? Or such a tiny internet plan?
Let's go with something more "design work friendly":
$5/mo 200 text messages
$60/mo 900 minutes of talk
$25/mo 2GB of data
$200 - 16GB iPhone 4
$30/mo unlimited data for iPad (I can't find new pricing, but I hear they removed unlimited)
$630 - 16GB 3G iPad
Total 2 year commitment: $3,710
The article linked also shows $102 worth of apps... yup, those tiny 1 and 2 digit price tags added up fast!
So, what is the alternative?
Well, for $300 more you can get a MacBook Pro with a Core i7, 4GB of RAM, a 500GB hard drive, and the Creative Suite Design Premium CS5. (you'll still want OmniGraffle for $100 if you want to make awesome flowcharts)
If you don't need to have OS X, you could also go with a PC laptop with a Core i7 and 4GB of RAM, Design Premium CS5, OmniGraffle, and a 3 year warranty that covers everything from hardware failure to dropping your laptop for $3170, leaving you $500 for a pay-as-you-go phone for the next few years.
No, you can't put a laptop in your pocket, and no, you don't have internet coverage unless you have WiFi.
Also, this is not a fair comparison for plenty of reasons.
I'm just saying that before you run out and buy a product, even if it is tried and true, be sure to check the alternatives first, and see what your Total Cost of Ownership is going to be... then ask yourself "What would I do with $3,710 and would I rather do that than have a sweet phone and tablet?"
Disclaimer: I have an iPhone but not a laptop... go figure.
Friday, April 09, 2010
Staying home to hang out with my family :)
Saturday, April 03, 2010
Interesting fact about the iPad
On my wife's facebook this morning one of her friends, Jenny, said: "I want to work for Apple. They really know how to put something out there that people so want but so do not need. What a great way to distract people from God's glorious weekend!" I couldn't agree more. I think the iPad has some great applications, even for pastors, and it can be use for spreading the gospel. But they are currently nothing more than a distraction from Easter
Weekend. I guess us Christians will need to just step up and start sharing our faith, in case someone missed a life changing Easter service. (and because that is what God commanded us to do). (no, I'm not really blaming Apple for church attendance, just wish people were buzzed about our risen savior as much as they are Apple's first tablet netbook)
Weekend. I guess us Christians will need to just step up and start sharing our faith, in case someone missed a life changing Easter service. (and because that is what God commanded us to do). (no, I'm not really blaming Apple for church attendance, just wish people were buzzed about our risen savior as much as they are Apple's first tablet netbook)
Sunday, March 14, 2010
A quick trip to the Microsoft Store in California
After the national Church IT Roundtable was over, I decided to hit up the Microsoft store to see what the big deal was. Apparently Microsoft has copied Apple, but added some more Microsoft touches, such as a sample living room with big screen TV capable of 3d movies and video games (not pictured), more than 4 products, and more than 2 colors. I love the Apple store, don't get me wrong, but Microsoft appears to have more money and is showing it off with some pretty elegant ways of implementing a video wall that wrapped around the whole store, but didn't change rapidly.
Each table held one genre of PCs, some with netbooks, some with touch screens, and other with power-house gaming computers. They even had a table full of netbook tablet PCs for around $550. (or you could throw in a few hundred more for a full blown tablet PC)
The staff were very polite and helpful, and when I started a geeky conversation it was obvious they knew their stuff. They told me I could bring my computer in for a free consultation, and they'd fix anything they could in 15 minutes. Anything longer and they'd give me a quote for buying support. (similar to Apple if you don't have a warranty)
Overall the impression was great, and because they had so many companies represented it was actually fun to walk around and play with stuff. (Especially the 3D TV, considering they also sold a 3D camera for making your own home movies that took advantage of the technology.) If you get the chance to visit one of these, definitely make the effort.
A developer's dream is for his son to count properly, starting at 0.
Thursday, February 04, 2010
And the award for the vinyl decal with the tiniest pieces goes to...
Vertical student ministries, for their current series "blood and water". This is going to be placed on a piece of backlit plexiglass on the Hub podium at Calvary of Albuquerque.
If you'd like a decal for your ministry, check out http://www.woventhorns.comSunday, January 31, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)